netdev - Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] split phylink PCS operations and add PCS support for dpaa2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:04:44 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] split phylink PCS operations and add PCS
 support for dpaa2

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 02:57:50PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Was there any conclusion on this 5 patch series, and whether I should
> submit it for net-next?

Hi Russell

The basic idea seems sound. So i suggest re-submitting without the RFC
tag, and let people comment on it again.

     Andrew