[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200326233859.GH3819@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 00:38:59 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: don't touch suspended flag if there's
no suspend/resume callback
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 06:58:24PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> So far we set phydev->suspended to true in phy_suspend() even if the
> PHY driver doesn't implement the suspend callback. This applies
> accordingly for the resume path. The current behavior doesn't cause
> any issue I'd be aware of, but it's not logical and misleading,
> especially considering the description of the flag:
> "suspended: Set to true if this phy has been suspended successfully"
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists