netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: remove unused vairable 'bpf_xdp_link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbeXgvahiDcV+bkMOrgud6-BryPaKUPV+eDQ=TjjqZaLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Mar 2020 21:17:30 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: remove unused vairable 'bpf_xdp_link_lops'

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:16 PM YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2263:34: warning: 'bpf_xdp_link_lops' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>  static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_xdp_link_lops;
>                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> commit 70ed506c3bbc ("bpf: Introduce pinnable bpf_link abstraction")
> involded this unused variable, remove it.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---

Yeah, I noticed this when I was adding bpf_cgroup_link (and replaced
this declaration with bpf_cgroup_link_lops. But I guess we can fix it
sooner.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>

>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 85567a6ea5f9..7774e55c9881 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -2252,7 +2252,6 @@ static int bpf_link_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>  static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_raw_tp_lops;
>  static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_tracing_link_lops;
> -static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_xdp_link_lops;
>
>  static void bpf_link_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *filp)
>  {
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>