lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Mar 2020 17:13:36 -0700
From:   Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@...omium.org>
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc:     Bluetooth Kernel Mailing List <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alain Michaud <alainm@...omium.org>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@...el.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Bluetooth: btusb: Indicate Microsoft vendor
 extension for Intel 9460/9560 and 9160/9260

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:01 AM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Miao-chen,
>
> > This adds a bit mask of driver_info for Microsoft vendor extension and
> > indicates the support for Intel 9460/9560 and 9160/9260. See
> > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/bluetooth/
> > microsoft-defined-bluetooth-hci-commands-and-events for more information
> > about the extension. This was verified with Intel ThunderPeak BT controller
> > where msft_vnd_ext_opcode is 0xFC1E.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Create net/bluetooth/msft.c with struct msft_vnd_ext defined internally
> > and change the hdev->msft_ext field to void*.
> > - Define and expose msft_vnd_ext_set_opcode() for btusb use.
> > - Init hdev->msft_ext in hci_alloc_dev() and deinit it in hci_free_dev().
>
> so I spent some cycles on thinking about on how we can have this nice and cleanly without putting too much into the core stack or hci_dev. I took your patches and converted them a little bit into how I would do it. Please have a look.
Thanks for brainstorming the framework. I will address your suggestion
in v4 shortly.

Regards,
Miao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ