netdev - Re: [PATCHv3 bpf-next 3/5] bpf: Don't refcount LISTEN sockets in sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:29:13 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Joe Stringer <joe@...d.net.nz>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 bpf-next 3/5] bpf: Don't refcount LISTEN sockets in
 sk_assign()

On 2020-03-27 1:38 p.m., Joe Stringer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 7:26 AM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>>

> 
> I think sock_pfree() steps in that direction, we would just need the
> corresponding refactoring for sk_assign bits. Sounds like a good idea.
> 
> This shouldn't functionally affect this series, I'm happy to either
> spin this into next revision of this series (if there's other
> feedback), or send a followup refactor for this, or defer this to your
> TC follow-up series that would consume the refactored functions.
> 

Does not affect this series - a followup would be great.

cheers,
jamal