[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200327010411.GM3819@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 02:04:11 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florinel Iordache <florinel.iordache@....com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com,
hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, kuba@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, shawnguo@...nel.org, leoyang.li@....com,
madalin.bucur@....nxp.com, ioana.ciornei@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/9] dt-bindings: net: add backplane dt bindings
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 03:51:15PM +0200, Florinel Iordache wrote:
> Add ethernet backplane device tree bindings
> + - |
> + /* Backplane configurations for specific setup */
> + &mdio9 {
> + bpphy6: ethernet-phy@0 {
> + compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45";
> + reg = <0x0>;
> + lane-handle = <&lane_d>; /* use lane D */
> + eq-algorithm = "bee";
> + /* 10G Short cables setup: up to 30 cm cable */
> + eq-init = <0x2 0x5 0x29>;
> + eq-params = <0>;
> + };
> + };
So you are modelling this as just another PHY? Does the driver get
loaded based on the PHY ID in registers 2 and 3? Does the standard
define these IDs or are they vendor specific?
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists