Message-ID: <e8ecb2ff-6241-e79d-047d-19013e480832@suse.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:13:08 +0200
From:   Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To:     Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org,
        wei.liu@...nel.org, paul@....org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] xen networking: add basic XDP support for
 xen-netfront

On 30.03.20 15:09, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> On 3/30/20, Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com> wrote:
>> On 30.03.20 14:16, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>> On 3/23/20, Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com> wrote:
>>>> On 23.03.20 11:49, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>>>> On 3/23/20, Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 23.03.20 11:15, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/18/20, Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18.03.20 13:50, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/18/20, Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 16.03.20 14:09, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> The patch adds a basic XDP processing to xen-netfront driver.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We ran an XDP program for an RX response received from netback
>>>>>>>>>>> driver. Also we request xen-netback to adjust data offset for
>>>>>>>>>>> bpf_xdp_adjust_head() header space for custom headers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is in no way a "verbose patch descriprion".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm missing:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Why are you doing this. "Add XDP support" is not enough, for
>>>>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>>>>>         a change I'd like to see some performance numbers to get an
>>>>>>>>>> idea
>>>>>>>>>>         of the improvement to expect, or which additional
>>>>>>>>>> functionality
>>>>>>>>>>         for the user is available.
>>>>>>>>> Ok, I'll try to measure  some numbers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - A short description for me as a Xen maintainer with only basic
>>>>>>>>>>         networking know-how, what XDP programs are about (a link to
>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>         more detailed doc is enough, of course) and how the
>>>>>>>>>> interface
>>>>>>>>>>         is working (especially for switching between XDP mode and
>>>>>>>>>> normal
>>>>>>>>>>         SKB processing).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can search for the "A practical introduction to XDP" tutorial.
>>>>>>>>> Actually there is a lot of information available regarding XDP, you
>>>>>>>>> can easily find it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - A proper description of the netfront/netback communication when
>>>>>>>>>>         enabling or disabling XDP mode (who is doing what, is
>>>>>>>>>> silencing
>>>>>>>>>>         of the virtual adapter required, ...).
>>>>>>>>> Currently we need only a header offset from netback driver so that
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>> put
>>>>>>>>> custom encapsulation header if required and that's done using xen
>>>>>>>>> bus
>>>>>>>>> state switching,
>>>>>>>>> so that:
>>>>>>>>> - netback tells that it can adjust the header offset
>>>>>>>>> - netfront part reads it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, but how is this synchronized with currently running network
>>>>>>>> load?
>>>>>>>> Assume you are starting without XDP being active and then you are
>>>>>>>> activating it. How is the synchronization done from which request on
>>>>>>>> the XDP headroom is available?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Jurgen,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> basically XDP is activated when you've assigned an xdp program to the
>>>>>>> networking device.
>>>>>>> Assigning an xdp program means that we have to adjust a pointer which
>>>>>>> is RCU protected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This doesn't answer my question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have basically two communication channels: the state of the
>>>>>> frontend
>>>>>> and backend for activation/deactivation of XDP, and the ring pages
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> the rx and tx requests and responses. How is the synchronization
>>>>>> between
>>>>>> those two channels done? So how does the other side know which of the
>>>>>> packets in flight will then have XDP on or off?
>>>>>
>>>>> Right,
>>>>> that's done in xen-netback using xenbus state:
>>>>> - in xennet_xdp_set() we call xenbus_switch_state to tell xen-netback
>>>>> to
>>>>> adjust offset for an RX response.
>>>>> -xen-netback reads the value from xenstore and adjusts the offset for
>>>>> xen-netback
>>>>> in xenvif_rx_data_slot() using vif->xdp_enabled flag.
>>>>
>>>> And before that all in-flight requests in the ring pages are being
>>>> processed and no new requests are guaranteed to be enqueued?
>>>
>>> Actually I don't see the need to sync these requests since that all we
>>> have to do is to copy
>>> data with specified offset:
>>> with xdp->enabled=1: copy with the offset XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM
>>> with xdd->enabled=0: copy without the offset
>>
>> Isn't that racy?
>>
>> In xennet_xdp_set() you set queue->xdp_prog and then you change the
>> state to Reconfiguring. From the time queue->xdp_prog is set you'll
>> do the Xdp processing in xennet_get_responses(), even if the response
>> you are working on doesn't have the headroom you need, as the backend
>> didn't create it with headroom (it needs some time until it has seen
>> the new state and could react on it by sending _new_ responses with
>> headroom).
> 
> Ah, I see. You mean that we have to wait until XenbusStateReconfigured
> is set in
> xen-netfront and only after that it's safe to process packets.

Right. That is the problem of using a different communication channel
for enabling/disabling XDP.


Juergen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists