[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200330192136.230459-22-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:21:29 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 21/28] netfilter: ctnetlink: be more strict when NF_CONNTRACK_MARK is not set
From: Romain Bellan <romain.bellan@...irst.fr>
When CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK is not set, any CTA_MARK or CTA_MARK_MASK
in netlink message are not supported. We should return an error when one
of them is set, not both
Fixes: 9306425b70bf ("netfilter: ctnetlink: must check mark attributes vs NULL")
Signed-off-by: Romain Bellan <romain.bellan@...irst.fr>
Signed-off-by: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...irst.fr>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index eb190206cd12..9ddfcd002d3b 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ ctnetlink_alloc_filter(const struct nlattr * const cda[], u8 family)
struct ctnetlink_filter *filter;
#ifndef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK
- if (cda[CTA_MARK] && cda[CTA_MARK_MASK])
+ if (cda[CTA_MARK] || cda[CTA_MARK_MASK])
return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
#endif
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists