[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c55c053-ab95-3657-e271-dd47c1daaf5e@solarflare.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 23:05:50 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
CC: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
"Andrey Ignatov" <rdna@...com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] xdp: Support specifying expected existing
program when attaching XDP
On 31/03/2020 04:43, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 04:25:07PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
>> Everything that a human operator can do, so can any program with the
>> same capabilities/wheel bits. Especially as the API that the
>> operator-tool uses *will* be open and documented. The Unix Way does
>> not allow unscriptable interfaces, and heavily frowns at any kind of
>> distinction between 'humans' and 'programs'.
> can you share a link on such philosophy?
It's not quite as explicit about it as I'd like, but
http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s06.html#id2877684
is the closest I can find right now.
-ed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists