| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOrHB_Bw1cUANoKe_1ZeGQkVVX6rj5YPTzzcNUjv3_KKRWehdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 20:57:26 -0700
From: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@....org>
To: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
ovs dev <dev@...nvswitch.org>, Andy Zhou <azhou@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] net: openvswitch: expand the meters
number supported
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 5:35 PM Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:46 AM Pravin Shelar <pshelar@....org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 8:46 AM <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> > >
> > > In kernel datapath of Open vSwitch, there are only 1024
> > > buckets of meter in one dp. If installing more than 1024
> > > (e.g. 8192) meters, it may lead to the performance drop.
> > > But in some case, for example, Open vSwitch used as edge
> > > gateway, there should be 200,000+ at least, meters used for
> > > IP address bandwidth limitation.
> > >
> > > [Open vSwitch userspace datapath has this issue too.]
> > >
> > > For more scalable meter, this patch expands the buckets
> > > when necessary, so we can install more meters in the datapath.
> > >
> > > * Introducing the struct *dp_meter_instance*, it's easy to
> > > expand meter though change the *ti* point in the struct
> > > *dp_meter_table*.
> > > * Using kvmalloc_array instead of kmalloc_array.
> > >
> > Thanks for working on this, I have couple of comments.
> >
> > > Cc: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>
> > > Cc: Andy Zhou <azhou@....org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > net/openvswitch/datapath.h | 2 +-
> > > net/openvswitch/meter.c | 168 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > net/openvswitch/meter.h | 17 +++-
> > > 3 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/openvswitch/datapath.h b/net/openvswitch/datapath.h
> > > index e239a46c2f94..785105578448 100644
> > > --- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.h
> > > +++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.h
> > > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ struct datapath {
> > > u32 max_headroom;
> > >
> > > /* Switch meters. */
> > > - struct hlist_head *meters;
> > > + struct dp_meter_table *meters;
> > > };
> > >
> > > /**
> > > diff --git a/net/openvswitch/meter.c b/net/openvswitch/meter.c
> > > index 5010d1ddd4bd..98003b201b45 100644
> > > --- a/net/openvswitch/meter.c
> > > +++ b/net/openvswitch/meter.c
> > > @@ -47,40 +47,136 @@ static void ovs_meter_free(struct dp_meter *meter)
> > > kfree_rcu(meter, rcu);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static struct hlist_head *meter_hash_bucket(const struct datapath *dp,
> > > +static struct hlist_head *meter_hash_bucket(struct dp_meter_instance *ti,
> > > u32 meter_id)
> > > {
> > > - return &dp->meters[meter_id & (METER_HASH_BUCKETS - 1)];
> > > + u32 hash = jhash_1word(meter_id, ti->hash_seed);
> > > +
> > I do not see any need to hash meter-id, can you explain it.
> >
> > > + return &ti->buckets[hash & (ti->n_buckets - 1)];
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Call with ovs_mutex or RCU read lock. */
> > > -static struct dp_meter *lookup_meter(const struct datapath *dp,
> > > +static struct dp_meter *lookup_meter(const struct dp_meter_table *tbl,
> > > u32 meter_id)
> > > {
> > > + struct dp_meter_instance *ti = rcu_dereference_ovsl(tbl->ti);
> > > struct dp_meter *meter;
> > > struct hlist_head *head;
> > >
> > > - head = meter_hash_bucket(dp, meter_id);
> > > - hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(meter, head, dp_hash_node,
> > > - lockdep_ovsl_is_held()) {
> > > + head = meter_hash_bucket(ti, meter_id);
> > > + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(meter, head, hash_node[ti->node_ver],
> > > + lockdep_ovsl_is_held()) {
> > > if (meter->id == meter_id)
> > > return meter;
> > > }
> > > +
> > This patch is expanding meter table linearly with number meters added
> > to datapath. so I do not see need to have hash table. it can be a
> > simple array. This would also improve lookup efficiency.
> > For hash collision we could find next free slot in array. let me know
> > what do you think about this approach.
> Hi Pravin
> If we use the simple array, when inserting the meter, for hash collision, we can
> find next free slot, but one case, when there are many meters in the array.
> we may find many slot for the free slot.
> And when we lookup the meter, for hash collision, we may find many
> array slots, and
> then find it, or that meter does not exist in the array, In that case,
> there may be a lookup performance
> drop.
>
I was thinking that users can insure that there are no hash collision,
but time complexity of negative case is expensive. so I am fine with
the hash table.
> For hash meter-id in meter_hash_bucket, I am not 100% sure it is
> useful. it just update
> hash_seed when expand meters. For performance, we can remove it. Thanks.
ok.
> > > return NULL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void attach_meter(struct datapath *dp, struct dp_meter *meter)
> > > +static struct dp_meter_instance *dp_meter_instance_alloc(const int size)
> > > +{
> > > + struct dp_meter_instance *ti;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + ti = kmalloc(sizeof(*ti), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!ti)
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +
> > > + ti->buckets = kvmalloc_array(size, sizeof(struct hlist_head),
> > > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!ti->buckets) {
> > > + kfree(ti);
> > > + return NULL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
> > > + INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&ti->buckets[i]);
> > > +
> > > + ti->n_buckets = size;
> > > + ti->node_ver = 0;
> > > + get_random_bytes(&ti->hash_seed, sizeof(u32));
> > > +
> > > + return ti;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void dp_meter_instance_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
> > > {
> > > - struct hlist_head *head = meter_hash_bucket(dp, meter->id);
> > > + struct dp_meter_instance *ti;
> > >
> > > - hlist_add_head_rcu(&meter->dp_hash_node, head);
> > > + ti = container_of(rcu, struct dp_meter_instance, rcu);
> > > + kvfree(ti->buckets);
> > > + kfree(ti);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void detach_meter(struct dp_meter *meter)
> > > +static void dp_meter_instance_insert(struct dp_meter_instance *ti,
> > > + struct dp_meter *meter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct hlist_head *head = meter_hash_bucket(ti, meter->id);
> > > +
> > > + hlist_add_head_rcu(&meter->hash_node[ti->node_ver], head);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void dp_meter_instance_remove(struct dp_meter_instance *ti,
> > > + struct dp_meter *meter)
> > > {
> > > + hlist_del_rcu(&meter->hash_node[ti->node_ver]);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static struct dp_meter_instance *
> > > +dp_meter_instance_expand(struct dp_meter_instance *ti)
> > > +{
> > > + struct dp_meter_instance *new_ti;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + new_ti = dp_meter_instance_alloc(ti->n_buckets * 2);
> > > + if (!new_ti)
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +
> > > + new_ti->node_ver = !ti->node_ver;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < ti->n_buckets; i++) {
> > > + struct hlist_head *head = &ti->buckets[i];
> > > + struct dp_meter *meter;
> > > +
> > > + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(meter, head, hash_node[ti->node_ver],
> > > + lockdep_ovsl_is_held())
> > > + dp_meter_instance_insert(new_ti, meter);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return new_ti;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void attach_meter(struct dp_meter_table *tbl, struct dp_meter *meter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct dp_meter_instance *new_ti;
> > > + struct dp_meter_instance *ti;
> > > +
> > > + ti = rcu_dereference_ovsl(tbl->ti);
> > > + dp_meter_instance_insert(ti, meter);
> > > +
> > > + /* operate the counter safely, because called with ovs_lock. */
> > > + tbl->count++;
> > > +
> > > + if (tbl->count > ti->n_buckets) {
> > > + new_ti = dp_meter_instance_expand(ti);
> > > +
> >
> >
> > > + if (new_ti) {
> > > + rcu_assign_pointer(tbl->ti, new_ti);
> > > + call_rcu(&ti->rcu, dp_meter_instance_free_rcu);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void detach_meter(struct dp_meter_table *tbl, struct dp_meter *meter)
> > > +{
> > > + struct dp_meter_instance *ti = rcu_dereference_ovsl(tbl->ti);
> > > +
> > > ASSERT_OVSL();
> > > - if (meter)
> > > - hlist_del_rcu(&meter->dp_hash_node);
> > > + if (meter) {
> > > + /* operate the counter safely, because called with ovs_lock. */
> > > + tbl->count--;
> > > + dp_meter_instance_remove(ti, meter);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > static struct sk_buff *
> > > @@ -303,9 +399,9 @@ static int ovs_meter_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> > > meter_id = nla_get_u32(a[OVS_METER_ATTR_ID]);
> > >
> > > /* Cannot fail after this. */
> > > - old_meter = lookup_meter(dp, meter_id);
> > > - detach_meter(old_meter);
> > > - attach_meter(dp, meter);
> > > + old_meter = lookup_meter(dp->meters, meter_id);
> > > + detach_meter(dp->meters, old_meter);
> > > + attach_meter(dp->meters, meter);
> > > ovs_unlock();
> > >
> > > /* Build response with the meter_id and stats from
> > > @@ -365,7 +461,7 @@ static int ovs_meter_cmd_get(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Locate meter, copy stats. */
> > > - meter = lookup_meter(dp, meter_id);
> > > + meter = lookup_meter(dp->meters, meter_id);
> > > if (!meter) {
> > > err = -ENOENT;
> > > goto exit_unlock;
> > > @@ -416,13 +512,13 @@ static int ovs_meter_cmd_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> > > goto exit_unlock;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - old_meter = lookup_meter(dp, meter_id);
> > > + old_meter = lookup_meter(dp->meters, meter_id);
> > > if (old_meter) {
> > > spin_lock_bh(&old_meter->lock);
> > > err = ovs_meter_cmd_reply_stats(reply, meter_id, old_meter);
> > > WARN_ON(err);
> > > spin_unlock_bh(&old_meter->lock);
> > > - detach_meter(old_meter);
> > > + detach_meter(dp->meters, old_meter);
> > > }
> > > ovs_unlock();
> > > ovs_meter_free(old_meter);
> > > @@ -452,7 +548,7 @@ bool ovs_meter_execute(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > int i, band_exceeded_max = -1;
> > > u32 band_exceeded_rate = 0;
> > >
> > > - meter = lookup_meter(dp, meter_id);
> > > + meter = lookup_meter(dp->meters, meter_id);
> > > /* Do not drop the packet when there is no meter. */
> > > if (!meter)
> > > return false;
> > > @@ -570,32 +666,44 @@ struct genl_family dp_meter_genl_family __ro_after_init = {
> > >
> > > int ovs_meters_init(struct datapath *dp)
> > > {
> > > - int i;
> > > + struct dp_meter_instance *ti;
> > > + struct dp_meter_table *tbl;
> > >
> > > - dp->meters = kmalloc_array(METER_HASH_BUCKETS,
> > > - sizeof(struct hlist_head), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + tbl = kmalloc(sizeof(*tbl), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!tbl)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > - if (!dp->meters)
> > > + tbl->count = 0;
> > > +
> > > + ti = dp_meter_instance_alloc(METER_HASH_BUCKETS);
> > > + if (!ti) {
> > > + kfree(tbl);
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > - for (i = 0; i < METER_HASH_BUCKETS; i++)
> > > - INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&dp->meters[i]);
> > > + rcu_assign_pointer(tbl->ti, ti);
> > > + dp->meters = tbl;
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > void ovs_meters_exit(struct datapath *dp)
> > > {
> > > + struct dp_meter_table *tbl = dp->meters;
> > > + struct dp_meter_instance *ti = rcu_dereference_ovsl(tbl->ti);
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > - for (i = 0; i < METER_HASH_BUCKETS; i++) {
> > > - struct hlist_head *head = &dp->meters[i];
> > > + for (i = 0; i < ti->n_buckets; i++) {
> > > + struct hlist_head *head = &ti->buckets[i];
> > > struct dp_meter *meter;
> > > struct hlist_node *n;
> > >
> > > - hlist_for_each_entry_safe(meter, n, head, dp_hash_node)
> > > - kfree(meter);
> > > + hlist_for_each_entry_safe(meter, n, head,
> > > + hash_node[ti->node_ver])
> > > + ovs_meter_free(meter);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - kfree(dp->meters);
> > > + kvfree(ti->buckets);
> > > + kfree(ti);
> > > + kfree(tbl);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/net/openvswitch/meter.h b/net/openvswitch/meter.h
> > > index f645913870bd..bc84796d7d4d 100644
> > > --- a/net/openvswitch/meter.h
> > > +++ b/net/openvswitch/meter.h
> > > @@ -30,9 +30,7 @@ struct dp_meter_band {
> > > struct dp_meter {
> > > spinlock_t lock; /* Per meter lock */
> > > struct rcu_head rcu;
> > > - struct hlist_node dp_hash_node; /*Element in datapath->meters
> > > - * hash table.
> > > - */
> > > + struct hlist_node hash_node[2];
> > > u32 id;
> > > u16 kbps:1, keep_stats:1;
> > > u16 n_bands;
> > > @@ -42,6 +40,19 @@ struct dp_meter {
> > > struct dp_meter_band bands[];
> > > };
> > >
> > > +struct dp_meter_instance {
> > > + struct hlist_head *buckets;
> > > + struct rcu_head rcu;
> > > + u32 n_buckets;
> > > + u32 hash_seed;
> > > + u8 node_ver;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +struct dp_meter_table {
> > > + struct dp_meter_instance __rcu *ti;
> > > + u32 count;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > extern struct genl_family dp_meter_genl_family;
> > > int ovs_meters_init(struct datapath *dp);
> > > void ovs_meters_exit(struct datapath *dp);
> > > --
> > > 2.23.0
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards, Tonghao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists