netdev - linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the spdx tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:23:34 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jian Yang <jianyang@...gle.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the spdx tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/.gitignore

between commit:

  d198b34f3855 (".gitignore: add SPDX License Identifier")

from the spdx tree and commit:

  5ef5c90e3cb3 ("selftests: move timestamping selftests to net folder")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (I just deleted the file) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped