[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200401155601.GW31519@unicorn.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:56:01 +0200
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mikhail Morfikov <morfikov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Creating a bonding interface via the ip tool gives it the wrong
MAC address
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 05:03:58PM +0200, Mikhail Morfikov wrote:
> A couple months ago I opened an issue on the Debian Bug Tracker[1] concerning
> some weird network behavior, in which bonding interface was involved. Basically,
> what I wanted to achieve was to have two interfaces (eth0 and wlan0) of my
> laptop in the *active-backup* mode, and in order to make this work, the
> *fail_over_mac* has to be set to *none*. Then the two interfaces (and also the
> bond0 interface) should have the same MAC address, which is set based on the
> interface specified by the *primary* parameter (in this case eth0).
>
> This was working well in the past, but it stopped for some reason. When the
> bond0 interface is being set up via the /etc/network/interfaces file, it gets
> wrong MAC address, and it's always the same MAC (ca:16:91:ae:9a:ba).
>
> I didn't really know where the problem was (it looks like no one knows so far),
> but I recently moved from ifupdown to systemd-networkd, and I noticed that the
> issue went away, at least in the default config. But in my case, I had to
> create the bonding interface during the initramfs/initrd phase using the *ip*
> tool (the regular one, and not the one from busybox). And the problem came back,
> but in this case I couldn't really fix it by just restarting the network
> connection.
>
> So I created manually the bond0 interface using the *ip* tool in the following
> way to check what will happen:
>
> ip link add name bond0 type bond mode active-backup \
> miimon 200 \
> downdelay 400 \
> updelay 400 \
> primary eth0 \
> primary_reselect always \
> fail_over_mac none \
> min_links 1
>
> and the interface got the MAC in question. That gave me the idea that something
> could be wrong with setting up/configuring the bonding interface via the *ip*
> tool because it works well with systemd-networkd, which I think doesn't use the
> tool to configure the network interfaces.
>
> So why does this happen?
I suspect you may be hitting the same issue as we had in
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136600
(comment 9 explains the problem).
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists