netdev - Re: restarting efforts on AQL on intel wifi, at least?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14f57458-a1d4-632d-7380-3c08e520f061@candelatech.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:08:14 -0700
From:   Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To:     Dave Taht <dave.taht@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        Make-Wifi-fast <make-wifi-fast@...ts.bufferbloat.net>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: restarting efforts on AQL on intel wifi, at least?

On 04/03/2020 09:56 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> the AQL patches for the ath10k finally landed in openwrt head, and were lovely:
>
> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/aql-and-the-ath10k-is-lovely/
>
> When I last looked the attempt to get at least some intel wifi chips
> working with AQL had stalled out with
> a variety of other problems. I've been sitting on a bunch of ax200
> chips, and am feeling inspired to tackle those.

Hello Dave,

What features does a driver need to support AQL?  The 'patch' to enable
it in ath10k-ct was just to enable a feature flag, so the underlying
features must have gone in earlier?

Thanks,
Ben

>
> Any news on other chips like the ath11k?
>

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com