[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200403144505.GZ162390@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 10:45:05 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
Cc: Dmitry Yakunin <zeil@...dex-team.ru>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net] inet_diag: add cgroup id attribute
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 05:37:17PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > How would this work with things like inetd? Would it make sense to associate the
> > socket on the first actual send/recv?
>
> First send/recv seems too intrusive.
Intrusive in terms of?
> Setsockopt to change association to current cgroup (or by id) seems more reasonable.
I'm not sure about exposing it as an explicit interface.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists