[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6efee6bb-d68d-0f83-d469-b173cf4f5d0f@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 18:42:33 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: decui@...rosoft.com, willy@...radead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, willemb@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, sdf@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fw@...len.de, jonathan.lemon@...il.com, pablo@...filter.org,
jeremy@...zel.net, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] skbuff.h: Improve the checksum related comments
On 4/5/20 6:26 PM, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> @@ -211,9 +211,9 @@
> * is implied by the SKB_GSO_* flags in gso_type. Most obviously, if the
> * gso_type is SKB_GSO_TCPV4 or SKB_GSO_TCPV6, TCP checksum offload as
> * part of the GSO operation is implied. If a checksum is being offloaded
> - * with GSO then ip_summed is CHECKSUM_PARTIAL, csum_start and csum_offset
> - * are set to refer to the outermost checksum being offload (two offloaded
> - * checksums are possible with UDP encapsulation).
> + * with GSO then ip_summed is CHECKSUM_PARTIAL, and both csum_start and
> + * csum_offset are set to refer to the outermost checksum being offload (two
being offloaded
> + * offloaded checksums are possible with UDP encapsulation).
> */
>
> /* Don't change this without changing skb_csum_unnecessary! */
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Thanks.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists