[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee168acb768d87776db2be4e978616f9187908d0.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:07:57 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, matthias.schoepfer@...inx.io,
Philipp.Berg@...bherr.com, Michael.Weitner@...bherr.com,
daniel.thompson@...aro.org, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix race in ieee80211_register_hw()
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 16:04 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 15:52 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > > Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 15:44 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > > > > > user-space ieee80211_register_hw() RX IRQ
> > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > | | |
> > > > > > |<---wlan0---wiphy_register() |
> > > > > > |----start wlan0---->| |
> > > > > > | |<---IRQ---(RX packet)
> > > > > > | Kernel crash |
> > > > > > | due to unallocated |
> > > > > > | workqueue. |
> > > >
> > > > [snip]
> > > >
> > > > > I have understood that no frames should be received until mac80211 calls
> > > > > struct ieee80211_ops::start:
> > > > >
> > > > > * @start: Called before the first netdevice attached to the hardware
> > > > > * is enabled. This should turn on the hardware and must turn on
> > > > > * frame reception (for possibly enabled monitor interfaces.)
> > > >
> > > > True, but I think he's saying that you can actually add and configure an
> > > > interface as soon as the wiphy is registered?
> > >
> > > With '<---IRQ---(RX packet)' I assumed wcn36xx is delivering a frame to
> > > mac80211 using ieee80211_rx(), but of course I'm just guessing here.
> >
> > Yeah, but that could be legitimate?
>
> Ah, I misunderstood then. The way I have understood is that no rx frames
> should be delivered (= calling ieee80211_rx()_ before start() is called,
> but if that's not the case please ignore me :)
No no, that _is_ the case. But I think the "start wlan0" could end up
calling it?
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists