netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mt7530: enable jumbo frame

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:19:42 +0800
From:   DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Weijie Gao <weijie.gao@...iatek.com>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mt7530: enable jumbo frame

So, since nothing else uses the mt7530_set_jumbo function, should I
remove the function and just add a single rmw to mt7530_setup?

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 1:20 AM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
> Date: Thu,  9 Apr 2020 23:54:09 +0800
>
> > +static void
> > +mt7530_set_jumbo(struct mt7530_priv *priv, u8 kilobytes)
> > +{
> > +     if (kilobytes > 15)
> > +             kilobytes = 15;
>  ...
> > +     /* Enable jumbo frame up to 15 KB */
> > +     mt7530_set_jumbo(priv, 15);
>
> You've made the test quite pointless, honestly.