netdev - Re: [RFC 0/6] Regressions for "imply" behavior change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f6d83b08fc0bc171b5ba5b2a0bc138727d92e2c0.camel@mellanox.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:49:41 +0000
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     "narmstrong@...libre.com" <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        "masahiroy@...nel.org" <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com" 
        <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "nico@...xnic.net" <nico@...xnic.net>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com" 
        <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        "jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com" <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        "a.hajda@...sung.com" <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        "jonas@...boo.se" <jonas@...boo.se>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "airlied@...ux.ie" <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "jernej.skrabec@...l.net" <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] Regressions for "imply" behavior change

On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 17:25 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:23 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:29 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 07:04:27PM +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > which in turn leads to mlx5_core.ko *not* containing
> > > mlx5_vxlan.o,
> > > and in turn causing that link error against
> > > mlx5_vxlan_create/mlx5_vxlan_destroy, unless the IS_ENABLED()
> > > is changed to IS_REACHABLE().
> > 
> > What about the reverse if mlx5_core is 'm' and VLXAN is 'y'?
> > 
> >  mlx5_core-m := mlx5_core.o
> >  mlx5_core-y += mlx5_vxlan.o
> > 
> > Magically works out?
> 
> Yes, Kbuild takes care of that case.
> 
> > > > IIRC that isn't what the expression does, if vxlan is 'n' then
> > > >   n || !n == true
> > > 
> > > It forces MLX5_CORE to 'm' or 'n' but not 'y' if VXLAN=m,
> > > but allows any option if VXLAN=y
> > 
> > And any option if VXLAN=n ?
> 
> Correct.
> 

Great !

Then bottom line we will change mlx5/Kconfig: to

depends on VXLAN || !VXLAN

This will force MLX5_CORE to m when necessary to make vxlan reachable
to mlx5_core.  So no need for explicit use of IS_REACHABLE().
in mlx5 there are 4 of these:

        imply PTP_1588_CLOCK
        imply VXLAN
        imply MLXFW
        imply PCI_HYPERV_INTERFACE


I will make a patch.

Thanks,
Saeed.