netdev - Re: [PATCH v1] ethtool: provide UAPI for PHY master/slave configuration.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200415134511.GB657811@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:45:11 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, mkl@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ethtool: provide UAPI for PHY master/slave
 configuration.

> In the IEEE 802.3 it is described as:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Port type: Bit 9.10 is to be used to indicate the preference to operate
> as MASTER (multiport device) or as SLAVE (single-port device) if the
> MASTER-SLAVE Manual Configuration Enable bit, 9.12, is not set.  Usage
> of this bit is described in 40.5.2.
> 1 = Multiport device
> 0 = single-port device

I really should go read the standard, but...

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Setting PORT_MODE_MASTER/PORT_MODE_SLAVE will increase the chance to get
> MASTER or SLAVE mode, but not force it.
> 
> If we will follow strictly to the IEEE 802.3 spec, it should be named:
> 
> #define PORT_MODE_UNKNOWN	0x00
> /* this two options will not force some specific mode, only influence
>  * the chance to get it */
> #define PORT_TYPE_MULTI_PORT	0x01
> #define PORT_TYPE_SINGLE_PORT	0x02
> /* this two options will force master or slave mode */
> #define PORT_MODE_MASTER	0x03
> #define PORT_MODE_SLAVE		0x04

I prefer having FORCE in the name.

But let me read the standard and get up to speed.

    Andrew