[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b2e0060-ef9b-5541-1108-e28464b47f0a@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:37:08 +0800
From: maowenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin Lau <kafai@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"kpsingh@...omium.org" <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] bpf: remove set but not used variable 'dst_known'
On 2020/4/15 6:05, Song Liu wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 13, 2020, at 4:37 AM, Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com> wrote:
>>
>> Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
>>
>> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:5603:18: warning: variable ‘dst_known’
>> set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>
>> It is not used since commit f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier:
>> rework value tracking")
>
> The fix makes sense. But I think f1174f77b50c introduced dst_known,
> so this statement is not accurate.
>
thanks for review, yes, f1174f77b50c introduced dst_known, and below commit
doesn't deference variable dst_known. So I send v2 later?
3f50f132d840 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mao Wenan <maowenan@...wei.com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists