lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <127743.1587032119@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:15:19 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        linux-nfs <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, fweimer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: What's a good default TTL for DNS keys in the kernel

Steve French <smfrench@...il.com> wrote:

> > 10 mins sounds like a reasonable default to me.
> 
> I would lean toward slightly longer (20 minutes?) but aren't there
> usually different timeouts for 'static' vs. 'dynamic' DNS records (so
> static records would have longer timeouts)?

Unfortunately, getaddrinfo() doesn't give me that information.

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ