netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v5 01/16] RDMA/irdma: Add driver framework definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Apr 2020 22:34:21 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jgg@...pe.ca,
        Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
        Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 01/16] RDMA/irdma: Add driver framework definitions

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:12:36AM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> From: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>
>
> Register irdma as a virtbus driver capable of supporting virtbus
> devices from multi-generation RDMA capable Intel HW. Establish the
> interface with all supported netdev peer drivers and initialize HW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/i40iw_if.c | 228 ++++++++++
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/irdma_if.c | 449 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/main.c     | 573 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/main.h     | 599 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 1849 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/i40iw_if.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/irdma_if.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/main.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/main.h
>

I didn't look in too much details, but three things caught my
attention immediately:
1. Existence of ARP cache management logic in RDMA driver.
2. Extensive use of dev_*() prints while we have ibdev_*() prints
3. Extra includes (moduleparam.h ???).

Thanks