netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: phy: bcm54140: add hwmon support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Apr 2020 21:53:11 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: phy: bcm54140: add hwmon support

Am 2020-04-17 21:50, schrieb Andrew Lunn:
>> +/* Check if one PHY has already done the init of the parts common to 
>> all PHYs
>> + * in the Quad PHY package.
>> + */
>> +static bool bcm54140_is_pkg_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> +{
>> +	struct mdio_device **map = phydev->mdio.bus->mdio_map;
>> +	struct bcm54140_phy_priv *priv;
>> +	struct phy_device *phy;
>> +	int i, addr;
>> +
>> +	/* Quad PHY */
>> +	for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>> +		priv = phydev->priv;
>> +		addr = priv->base_addr + i;
>> +
>> +		if (!map[addr])
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		phy = container_of(map[addr], struct phy_device, mdio);
> 
> I don't particularly like a PHY driver having knowledge of the mdio
> bus core. Please add a helper in the core to get you the phydev for a
> particular address.
> 
> There is also the question of locking. What happens if the PHY devices
> is unbound while you have an instance of its phydev? What happens if
> the base PHY is unbound? Are the three others then unusable?
> 
> I think we need to take a step back and look at how we handle quad
> PHYs in general. The VSC8584 has many of the same issues.

Correct, and this function was actually stolen from there ;) This was
actually stolen from the mscc PHY ;)

-michael