netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 10/13] bridge: mrp: Implement netlink interface to configure MRP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <066720c4-ddc4-ce71-734f-932b6a342e01@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:18:31 +0300
From:   Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        jiri@...nulli.us, ivecera@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, olteanv@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/13] bridge: mrp: Implement netlink interface
 to configure MRP

On 20/04/2020 18:09, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> Implement netlink interface to configure MRP. The implementation
> will do sanity checks over the attributes and then eventually call the MRP
> interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 117 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0ff42e7c7f57
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +
> +#include <net/genetlink.h>
> +
> +#include <uapi/linux/mrp_bridge.h>
> +#include "br_private.h"
> +#include "br_private_mrp.h"
> +
> +static const struct nla_policy br_mrp_policy[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX + 1] = {
> +	[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_UNSPEC]	= { .type = NLA_REJECT },
> +	[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_INSTANCE]	= { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> +					    .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_instance)},
> +	[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_STATE]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
> +	[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_ROLE]	= { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> +					    .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_port_role)},
> +	[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE]	= { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> +					    .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_ring_state)},
> +	[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE]	= { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> +					    .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_ring_role)},
> +	[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST]	= { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> +					    .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_start_test)},
> +};
> +
> +int br_mrp_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
> +		 struct nlattr *attr, int cmd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	struct nlattr *tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX + 1];
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (br->stp_enabled != BR_NO_STP) {
> +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "MRP can't be enabled if STP is already enabled\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = nla_parse_nested(tb, IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX, attr,
> +			       NULL, extack);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_INSTANCE]) {
> +		struct br_mrp_instance *instance =
> +			nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_INSTANCE]);
> +
> +		if (cmd == RTM_SETLINK)
> +			err = br_mrp_add(br, instance);
> +		else
> +			err = br_mrp_del(br, instance);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_STATE]) {
> +		enum br_mrp_port_state_type state =
> +			nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_STATE]);
> +
> +		err = br_mrp_set_port_state(p, state);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_ROLE]) {
> +		struct br_mrp_port_role *role =
> +			nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_ROLE]);
> +
> +		err = br_mrp_set_port_role(p, role);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE]) {
> +		struct br_mrp_ring_state *state =
> +			nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE]);
> +
> +		err = br_mrp_set_ring_state(br, state);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE]) {
> +		struct br_mrp_ring_role *role =
> +			nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE]);
> +
> +		err = br_mrp_set_ring_role(br, role);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST]) {
> +		struct br_mrp_start_test *test =
> +			nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST]);
> +
> +		err = br_mrp_start_test(br, test);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int br_mrp_port_open(struct net_device *dev, u8 loc)
> +{
> +	struct net_bridge_port *p;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	p = br_port_get_rcu(dev);
> +	if (!p) {
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	p->loc = loc;
> +	br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_NEWLINK, NULL, p);
> +
> +out:
> +	return err;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(br_mrp_port_open);
> 

I just noticed the EXPORT_SYMBOL() here, why do you need it?