| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200420191637.5skfpcayidzkb43w@soft-dev3.microsemi.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 21:16:37 +0200
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <jiri@...nulli.us>, <ivecera@...hat.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
<olteanv@...il.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/13] bridge: mrp: Implement netlink interface
to configure MRP
The 04/20/2020 20:18, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 20/04/2020 18:09, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > Implement netlink interface to configure MRP. The implementation
> > will do sanity checks over the attributes and then eventually call the MRP
> > interface.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> > ---
> > net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> >
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..0ff42e7c7f57
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +
> > +#include <net/genetlink.h>
> > +
> > +#include <uapi/linux/mrp_bridge.h>
> > +#include "br_private.h"
> > +#include "br_private_mrp.h"
> > +
> > +static const struct nla_policy br_mrp_policy[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX + 1] = {
> > + [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_UNSPEC] = { .type = NLA_REJECT },
> > + [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_INSTANCE] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> > + .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_instance)},
> > + [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_STATE] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> > + [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_ROLE] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> > + .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_port_role)},
> > + [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> > + .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_ring_state)},
> > + [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> > + .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_ring_role)},
> > + [IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST] = { .type = NLA_EXACT_LEN,
> > + .len = sizeof(struct br_mrp_start_test)},
> > +};
> > +
> > +int br_mrp_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
> > + struct nlattr *attr, int cmd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > +{
> > + struct nlattr *tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX + 1];
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + if (br->stp_enabled != BR_NO_STP) {
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "MRP can't be enabled if STP is already enabled\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = nla_parse_nested(tb, IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX, attr,
> > + NULL, extack);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_INSTANCE]) {
> > + struct br_mrp_instance *instance =
> > + nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_INSTANCE]);
> > +
> > + if (cmd == RTM_SETLINK)
> > + err = br_mrp_add(br, instance);
> > + else
> > + err = br_mrp_del(br, instance);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_STATE]) {
> > + enum br_mrp_port_state_type state =
> > + nla_get_u32(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_STATE]);
> > +
> > + err = br_mrp_set_port_state(p, state);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_ROLE]) {
> > + struct br_mrp_port_role *role =
> > + nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_PORT_ROLE]);
> > +
> > + err = br_mrp_set_port_role(p, role);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE]) {
> > + struct br_mrp_ring_state *state =
> > + nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE]);
> > +
> > + err = br_mrp_set_ring_state(br, state);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE]) {
> > + struct br_mrp_ring_role *role =
> > + nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE]);
> > +
> > + err = br_mrp_set_ring_role(br, role);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST]) {
> > + struct br_mrp_start_test *test =
> > + nla_data(tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST]);
> > +
> > + err = br_mrp_start_test(br, test);
> > + if (err)
> > + return err;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int br_mrp_port_open(struct net_device *dev, u8 loc)
> > +{
> > + struct net_bridge_port *p;
> > + int err = 0;
> > +
> > + p = br_port_get_rcu(dev);
> > + if (!p) {
> > + err = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + p->loc = loc;
> > + br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_NEWLINK, NULL, p);
> > +
> > +out:
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(br_mrp_port_open);
> >
>
> I just noticed the EXPORT_SYMBOL() here, why do you need it?
Actually is not needed. But I am thinking to drop patch 4. The reason
for patch nr 4, was that the drivers should notify when the ports lost
the continuity. But currently there is no driver using the MRP then
there is no point to have. I will add it back once the drivers start to
use the MRP.
>
--
/Horatiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists