netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: cpts: Condition WARN_ON on PTP_1588

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200420213406.GB20996@localhost>
Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:34:06 -0700
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Clay McClure <clay@...mons.net>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: cpts: Condition WARN_ON on PTP_1588_CLOCK

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:21:20PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> It's not great, but we have other interfaces like this that can return NULL for
> success when the subsystem is disabled. The problem is when there is
> a mismatch between the caller treating NULL as failure when it is meant to
> be "successful lack of object returned".

Yeah, that should be fixed.

To be clear, do you all see a need to change the stubbed version of
ptp_clock_register() or not?

Thanks,
Richard