[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200421084737.GE716720@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:47:37 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, jgg@...pe.ca,
parav@...lanox.com, galpress@...zon.com,
selvin.xavier@...adcom.com, sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com,
benve@...co.com, bharat@...lsio.com, xavier.huwei@...wei.com,
yishaih@...lanox.com, leonro@...lanox.com, mkalderon@...vell.com,
aditr@...are.com, ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@...el.com>,
Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v2 1/9] Implementation of Virtual Bus
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 01:02:27AM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> +struct virtbus_driver {
> + int (*probe)(struct virtbus_device *);
> + int (*remove)(struct virtbus_device *);
> + void (*shutdown)(struct virtbus_device *);
> + int (*suspend)(struct virtbus_device *, pm_message_t);
> + int (*resume)(struct virtbus_device *);
> + struct device_driver driver;
> + const struct virtbus_dev_id *id_table;
> +};
You create this type of driver, but then never use it in your
implementations that happen to create virtbus devices. So does that
imply that you do not need virbus_drivers at all? Why add all of this
code that never gets used?
Or perhaps you should be creating a virbus driver? I can't tell, but as
it is, this series is not ready to be merged.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists