[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8504b66-04d7-e843-67d7-70f50a6aa546@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 08:14:57 -0500
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com
Cc: opendmb@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] net: bcmgenet: Clean up after ACPI enablement
On 4/20/20 6:25 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:51:16 +0300
>
>> ACPI enablement series had missed some clean ups that would have been done
>> at the same time. Here are these bits.
>>
>> In v2:
>> - return dev_dbg() calls to avoid spamming logs when probe is deferred (Florian)
>> - added Ack (Florian)
>> - combined two, earlier sent, series together
>> - added couple more patches
>
> Series applied to net-next, thanks.
>
Well, you guys are two fast for me.. <chuckle> Or rather the couple
hours it took to build the kernel on the rpi4.
Anyway, the changes looks like fine, and boots fine in ACPI mode.
Its probably to late for this but anyway:
Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists