netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 12/16] libbpf: Add egress XDP support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87k1297ytq.fsf@toke.dk>
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:28:17 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        prashantbhole.linux@...il.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
        brouer@...hat.com, toshiaki.makita1@...il.com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...nel.org,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andriin@...com,
        David Ahern <dahern@...italocean.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 12/16] libbpf: Add egress XDP support

David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> writes:

> On 4/21/20 4:20 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Isn't the kernel returning both program types in the same message when
>> dumping an interface? So do we really need a separate getter instead of
>> just populating xdp_link_info with the egress ID in the existing getter?
>
> That might work with some refactoring of get_xdp_info. I'll take a look.

Great, thanks! :)

-Toke