[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7bcd7a65740a6f85637ef17ed6b6a1e3@walle.cc>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:25:19 +0200
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: add concept of shared storage
for PHYs
Am 2020-04-21 01:26, schrieb Michael Walle:
> +
> +/* Represents a shared structure between different phydev's in the
> same
> + * package, for example a quad PHY. See phy_package_join() and
> + * phy_package_leave().
> + */
> +struct phy_package_shared {
> + int addr;
> + refcount_t refcnt;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /* private data pointer */
> + /* note that this pointer is shared between different phydevs and
> + * the user has to take care of appropriate locking.
> + */
> + void *priv;
btw. how should a driver actually use this? I mean, it can allocate
memory if its still NULL but when will it be freed again. Do we need
a callback? Is there something better than a callback?
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists