lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Apr 2020 21:29:46 -0700
From:   Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
To:     Luke Nelson <lukenels@...washington.edu>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf, riscv: Fix tail call count off by one in RV32
 BPF JIT

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 5:28 PM Luke Nelson <lukenels@...washington.edu> wrote:
> This patch fixes an off by one error in the RV32 JIT handling for BPF
> tail call. Currently, the code decrements TCC before checking if it
> is less than zero. This limits the maximum number of tail calls to 32
> instead of 33 as in other JITs. The fix is to instead check the old
> value of TCC before decrementing.
>
> Fixes: 5f316b65e99f ("riscv, bpf: Add RV32G eBPF JIT")
> Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> index 302934177760..11083d4d5f2d 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
> @@ -770,12 +770,13 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(int insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
>         emit_bcc(BPF_JGE, lo(idx_reg), RV_REG_T1, off, ctx);
>
>         /*
> -        * if ((temp_tcc = tcc - 1) < 0)
> +        * temp_tcc = tcc - 1;
> +        * if (tcc < 0)
>          *   goto out;
>          */
>         emit(rv_addi(RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_TCC, -1), ctx);
>         off = (tc_ninsn - (ctx->ninsns - start_insn)) << 2;
> -       emit_bcc(BPF_JSLT, RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_ZERO, off, ctx);
> +       emit_bcc(BPF_JSLT, RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_ZERO, off, ctx);

Nice catch!

Acked-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ