netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v5 14/16] RDMA/irdma: Add ABI definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200421072253.GH121146@unreal>
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:22:53 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     "Saleem, Shiraz" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
Cc:     "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        "Ismail, Mustafa" <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
        "sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 14/16] RDMA/irdma: Add ABI definitions

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:29:15AM +0000, Saleem, Shiraz wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 14/16] RDMA/irdma: Add ABI definitions
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:12:49AM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > From: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>
> > >
> > > Add ABI definitions for irdma.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/uapi/rdma/irdma-abi.h | 140
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 140 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 include/uapi/rdma/irdma-abi.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/irdma-abi.h
> > > b/include/uapi/rdma/irdma-abi.h new file mode 100644 index
> > > 000000000000..2eb253220161
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/rdma/irdma-abi.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR
> > > +Linux-OpenIB) */
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2006 - 2019 Intel Corporation.  All rights reserved.
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2005 Topspin Communications.  All rights reserved.
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2005 Cisco Systems.  All rights reserved.
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2005 Open Grid Computing, Inc. All rights reserved.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef IRDMA_ABI_H
> > > +#define IRDMA_ABI_H
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > > +
> > > +/* irdma must support legacy GEN_1 i40iw kernel
> > > + * and user-space whose last ABI ver is 5  */ #define IRDMA_ABI_VER 6
> > > +
> > > +enum irdma_memreg_type {
> > > +	IW_MEMREG_TYPE_MEM  = 0,
> > > +	IW_MEMREG_TYPE_QP   = 1,
> > > +	IW_MEMREG_TYPE_CQ   = 2,
> > > +	IW_MEMREG_TYPE_RSVD = 3,
> > > +	IW_MEMREG_TYPE_MW   = 4,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +struct irdma_alloc_ucontext_req {
> > > +	__u32 rsvd32;
> > > +	__u8 userspace_ver;
> > > +	__u8 rsvd8[3];
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +struct i40iw_alloc_ucontext_req {
> > > +	__u32 rsvd32;
> > > +	__u8 userspace_ver;
> > > +	__u8 rsvd8[3];
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +struct irdma_alloc_ucontext_resp {
> > > +	__aligned_u64 feature_flags;
> > > +	__aligned_u64 db_mmap_key;
> > > +	__u32 max_hw_wq_frags;
> > > +	__u32 max_hw_read_sges;
> > > +	__u32 max_hw_inline;
> > > +	__u32 max_hw_rq_quanta;
> > > +	__u32 max_hw_wq_quanta;
> > > +	__u32 min_hw_cq_size;
> > > +	__u32 max_hw_cq_size;
> > > +	__u32 rsvd1[7];
> > > +	__u16 max_hw_sq_chunk;
> > > +	__u16 rsvd2[11];
> > > +	__u8 kernel_ver;
> >
> > Why do you need to copy this kernel_ver from i40iw?
> > Especially given the fact that i40iw didn't use it too much
> >  120 static int i40iw_alloc_ucontext(struct ib_ucontext *uctx,
> >  121                                 struct ib_udata *udata)
> >  <...>
> >  140         uresp.kernel_ver = req.userspace_ver;
> >
> Its used to pass the current driver ABI ver. to user-space so that
> there is compatibility check in user-space as well.
> for example: old i40iw user-space provider wont bind to gen_2 devices
> by checking the kernel_ver and finding its incompatible. It will bind with
> gen_1 devices though..

I understand that you must keep it in struct i40iw_alloc_ucontext_resp,
but here we are talking about struct irdma_alloc_ucontext_resp. Anyway
the rdma-core should be extended to work with this new struct and you
always return kernel_ver == userspace_ver, which makes impossible to
do any compatibility check.

Plus kernel is expected to be backward compatible.

Thanks

>