netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 04/16] net: Add BPF_XDP_EGRESS as a bpf_attach

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:27:30 +0200
From:   Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        prashantbhole.linux@...il.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
        brouer@...hat.com, toshiaki.makita1@...il.com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...nel.org,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andriin@...com,
        David Ahern <dahern@...italocean.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 04/16] net: Add BPF_XDP_EGRESS as a bpf_attach_type

David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> writes:

> On 4/22/20 5:21 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Not saying a fix to freplace *has* to be part of this series; just
>> saying that I would be more comfortable if that was fixed before we
>> merge this.
>
> You don't have a test case that fails, you just think there is a problem
> based on code analysis. Have you taken this presumption up with the
> author of the freplace code?

Well this is a mailing list, isn't it? So that's what I'm doing;
hopefully Alexei will chime in... Otherwise I guess I can produce a
testcase tomorrow.

And as I said in the beginning, I'm perfectly happy to be told why I'm
wrong; but so far you have just been arguing that I'm out of scope ;)

-Toke