[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30c615a70de5a5cbfee2a2bf221c1ff950dc6054.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:48:53 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Bo YU <tsu.yubo@...il.com>
Cc: matthieu.baerts@...sares.net, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mptcp@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 -next] mptcp/pm_netlink.c : add check for
nla_put_in/6_addr
On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 22:56 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:12:27PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 09:34 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> > > Normal there should be checked for nla_put_in6_addr like other
> > > usage in net.
> > >
> > > Detected by CoverityScan, CID# 1461639
> > >
> > > Fixes: 01cacb00b35c("mptcp: add netlink-based PM")
> > > Signed-off-by: Bo YU <tsu.yubo@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > V2: Add check for nla_put_in_addr suggested by Paolo Abeni
> >
> > Thank you for addressing my feedback!
> >
> > > ---
> > > net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 11 +++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> > > index 86d61ab34c7c..0a39f0ebad76 100644
> > > --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> > > +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
> > > @@ -599,12 +599,15 @@ static int mptcp_nl_fill_addr(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > nla_put_s32(skb, MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_IF_IDX, entry->ifindex))
> > > goto nla_put_failure;
> > >
> > > - if (addr->family == AF_INET)
> > > + if (addr->family == AF_INET &&
> > > nla_put_in_addr(skb, MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ADDR4,
> > > - addr->addr.s_addr);
> > > + addr->addr.s_addr))
> > > + goto nla_put_failure;
> > > +
> >
> > I'm very sorry about the nit-picking, but the above is now a single
> > statement, and indentation should be adjusted accordingly:
> > 'nla_put_in_addr()' should be aligned with 'addr->family'.
> Ok, but i just want to make clear for that, do you mean:
>
>
> if (addr->family == AF_INET && nla_put_in_addr(skb,
> MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ADDR4, addr->addr.s_addr))
>
> In fact, i was upset by checkpatch about over 80 chars warning.
> This is my originally version patch to fix it :(. If i was wrong
> to understand your means, please correct me. Thank you.
I mean:
if (addr->family == AF_INET &&
nla_put_in_addr(skb, MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ADDR4,
addr->addr.s_addr))
note that [the first char of] 'nla_put_in_addr' is aligned with [the
first char of] 'addr->family', and 'addr->addr.s_addr' with 'skb'.
Please, nota that the same applies to nla_put_in6_addr() below.
Thanks!
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists