[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKU6vybSa3vwxNcgG2oLmYcvYhaeFhtkJGLKT7Rg=24t7Ju0yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 21:13:26 -0700
From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Luke Nelson <lukenels@...washington.edu>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf, x32: Fix invalid instruction in BPF_LDX zero-extension
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 8:22 PM Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
> You should explain the reason it is invalid, ie. the instruction
> encoding needs a 32-bit immediate but the current code only emits an
> 8-bit immediate.
Thanks! Will do in v2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists