[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKU6vyaHcGmgznkDav1wpkB3MiSYM9G2pqmc6DELXwUyNpHwyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 00:22:16 -0700
From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
To: hpa@...or.com
Cc: Luke Nelson <lukenels@...washington.edu>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@...il.com>,
Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf, x32: Fix invalid instruction in BPF_LDX zero-extension
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:13 AM <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> C7 C0 0 is *not* an invalid instruction, although it is incomplete. It is a different, but arguably even more serious, problem.
Yep, it would "eat" three bytes coming after that. :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists