lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:00:03 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>
Cc:     Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        gregory.clement@...tlin.com, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
        Stefan Chulski <stefanc@...vell.com>,
        Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: mvpp2: cls: Use RSS contexts to handle
 RSS tables

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 01:43:02AM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 1:21 AM Maxime Chevallier
> <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > The PPv2 controller has 8 RSS tables that are shared across all ports on
> > a given PPv2 instance. The previous implementation allocated one table
> > per port, leaving others unused.
> >
> > By using RSS contexts, we can make use of multiple RSS tables per
> > port, one being the default table (always id 0), the other ones being
> > used as destinations for flow steering, in the same way as rx rings.
> >
> > This commit introduces RSS contexts management in the PPv2 driver. We
> > always reserve one table per port, allocated when the port is probed.
> >
> > The global table list is stored in the struct mvpp2, as it's a global
> > resource. Each port then maintains a list of indices in that global
> > table, that way each port can have it's own numbering scheme starting
> > from 0.
> >
> > One limitation that seems unavoidable is that the hashing parameters are
> > shared across all RSS contexts for a given port. Hashing parameters for
> > ctx 0 will be applied to all contexts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I noticed that enabling rxhash blocks the RX on my Macchiatobin. It
> works fine with the 10G ports (the RX rate goes 4x up) but it
> completely kills the gigabit interface.
> 
> # 10G port
> root@...chiatobin:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.0.2
> Connecting to host 192.168.0.2, port 5201
> [  5] local 192.168.0.1 port 42394 connected to 192.168.0.2 port 5201
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
> [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   941 MBytes  7.89 Gbits/sec  4030    250 KBytes
> [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   933 MBytes  7.82 Gbits/sec  4393    240 KBytes
> root@...chiatobin:~# ethtool -K eth0 rxhash on
> root@...chiatobin:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.0.2
> Connecting to host 192.168.0.2, port 5201
> [  5] local 192.168.0.1 port 42398 connected to 192.168.0.2 port 5201
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
> [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   860 MBytes  7.21 Gbits/sec  428    410 KBytes
> [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   859 MBytes  7.20 Gbits/sec  185    563 KBytes
> 
> # gigabit port
> root@...chiatobin:~# iperf3 -c turbo
> Connecting to host turbo, port 5201
> [  5] local 192.168.85.42 port 45144 connected to 192.168.85.6 port 5201
> [ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
> [  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   113 MBytes   948 Mbits/sec    0    407 KBytes
> [  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   112 MBytes   942 Mbits/sec    0    428 KBytes
> root@...chiatobin:~# ethtool -K eth2 rxhash on
> root@...chiatobin:~# iperf3 -c turbo
> iperf3: error - unable to connect to server: Resource temporarily unavailable
> 
> I've bisected and it seems that this commit causes the issue. I tried
> to revert it on nex-next as a second test, but the code has changed a
> lot much since, generating too much conflicts.
> Can you have a look into this?

This behaviour on eth2 is confirmed here on v5.6.  Turning on rxhash
appears to prevent eth2 working.

Maxime, please look into this regression, thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up

Powered by blists - more mailing lists