[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b47f742d-e79a-11c8-6d39-db27dced28b8@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:15:42 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/4] dt-bindings: net: phy: Add support for
NXP TJA11xx
On 4/22/2020 2:24 AM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Document the NXP TJA11xx PHY bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,tja11xx.yaml | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,tja11xx.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,tja11xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,tja11xx.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..42be0255512b3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nxp,tja11xx.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/nxp,tja11xx.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: NXP TJA11xx PHY
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> + - Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> + - Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
I would have expected to have you listed as a maintainer of this
binding, but fair enough.
> +
> +description:
> + Bindings for NXP TJA11xx automotive PHYs
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: ethernet-phy.yaml#
> +
> +patternProperties:
> + "^ethernet-phy@[0-9a-f]+$":
> + type: object
> + description: |
> + Some packages have multiple PHYs. Secondary PHY should be defines as
should be defined as a subnode.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists