[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+_6Rkynsoqe51G-jOxOfQq54QMmzbCoZJSKe_yrufTpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 22:27:49 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf_helpers.h: Add note for building with
vmlinux.h or linux/types.h
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 5:05 PM Yoshiki Komachi
<komachi.yoshiki@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The following error was shown when a bpf program was compiled without
> vmlinux.h auto-generated from BTF:
>
> # clang -I./linux/tools/lib/ -I/lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/include/ \
> -O2 -Wall -target bpf -emit-llvm -c bpf_prog.c -o bpf_prog.bc
> ...
> In file included from linux/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helpers.h:5:
> linux/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_helper_defs.h:56:82: error: unknown type name '__u64'
> ...
>
> It seems that bpf programs are intended for being built together with
> the vmlinux.h (which will have all the __u64 and other typedefs). But
> users may mistakenly think "include <linux/types.h>" is missing
> because the vmlinux.h is not common for non-bpf developers. IMO, an
> explicit comment therefore should be added to bpf_helpers.h as this
> patch shows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@...il.com>
Applied. Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists