[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sggt3ye7.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 13:40:16 +0200
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...com, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: andrii.nakryiko@...il.com, kernel-team@...com,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/10] bpf_link observability APIs
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com> writes:
> This patch series adds various observability APIs to bpf_link:
> - each bpf_link now gets ID, similar to bpf_map and bpf_prog, by which
> user-space can iterate over all existing bpf_links and create limited FD
> from ID;
> - allows to get extra object information with bpf_link general and
> type-specific information;
> - implements `bpf link show` command which lists all active bpf_links in the
> system;
> - implements `bpf link pin` allowing to pin bpf_link by ID or from other
> pinned path.
>
> rfc->v1:
> - dropped read-only bpf_links (Alexei);
Just to make sure I understand this right: With this change, the
GET_FD_BY_ID operation will always return a r/w bpf_link fd that can
subsequently be used to detach the link? And you're doing the 'access
limiting' by just requiring CAP_SYS_ADMIN for the whole thing. Right? :)
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists