lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:25:38 -0700 From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> To: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf, x86_32: Fix logic error in BPF_LDX zero-extension On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:18 PM Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com> wrote: > > When verifier_zext is true, we don't need to emit code > for zero-extension. > > Fixes: 836256bf ("x32: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen") > > Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com> Applied. Please make sure fixes tag looks like this: Fixes: 836256bf5f37 ("x32: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen") all 12 digits.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists