lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 26 Apr 2020 08:59:20 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <>
        Andrii Nakryiko <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix missing bpf_base_func_proto in
 cgroup_base_func_proto for CGROUP_NET=n

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:59:41PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> linux-next build bot reported compile issue [1] with one of its
> configs. It looks like when we have CONFIG_NET=n and
> CONFIG_BPF{,_SYSCALL}=y, we are missing the bpf_base_func_proto
> definition (from net/core/filter.c) in cgroup_base_func_proto.
> I'm reshuffling the code a bit to make it work. The common helpers
> are moved into kernel/bpf/helpers.c and the bpf_base_func_proto is
> exported from there.
> Also, bpf_get_raw_cpu_id goes into kernel/bpf/core.c akin to existing
> bpf_user_rnd_u32.
> [1]
> Fixes: 76800cfc27c6 ("bpf: Enable more helpers for BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_{DEVICE,SYSCTL,SOCKOPT}")
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <>

Applied, Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists