lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:34:46 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> To: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:06:50PM -0700, Andrey Ignatov wrote: > > - > > -#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK > > Decided to skim through the patch one last time to double-check the fix > from previous iteration and found that this ifdef got lost below. > > > -extern int sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, > > - void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, > > - loff_t *ppos); > > -#endif There is no need for ifdefs around prototypes that aren't used.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists