lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:12:20 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Cc:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: flow_offload: skip hw stats check for
 FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED

On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:31:48 +0100 Edward Cree wrote:
> On 22/04/2020 19:37, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > "Any" can't be "don't care". TC User expects stats. That's default.
> >
> > Let's have "don't care" bit only and set it for
> > ethtool/netfilter/flowtable. Don't change any. Teach the drivers to deal
> > with "don't care", most probably using the default checker.  
> I think the right solution is either this, or the semantically-similar
>  approach of "0 means don't care, we have a bit for disabled, and ANY
>  (the TC default) is "all the bits except disabled", i.e.
>  DELAYED | IMMEDIATE.  That seems slightly cleaner to me, as then non-
>  zero settings are always "here is a bitmask of options, driver may
>  choose any of them".  (And 0 differs from DELAYED | IMMEDIATE | DISABLED
>  only in that if new bits are added to kernel, 0 includes them.)

+1

> And of course either way the TC uAPI needs to be able to specify the
>  new "don't care" option.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists