[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be1461d3-f87e-0bfa-0b37-6eef4a2519e6@marvell.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 23:04:24 +0300
From: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mark Starovoytov" <mstarovoitov@...vell.com>,
Dmitry Bogdanov <dbogdanov@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 08/17] net: atlantic: A2
driver-firmware interface
>>> Please remove __packed unless you can prove it matters.
>>
>> Just double checked the layout without packed pragma, below is what
> pahole
>> diff gives just on one structure.
>
> Okay, then mark the appropriate fields of that structure as packed.
> I looked at first 4 structures and they should require no packing.
Hi Jakub.
This means I have to dig each and every structure in this header and
understand whether it may suffer from implicit alignment/holes or not.
Not mentioning the fact that these alignment rules are different on other
compilers, or on say 32-bit archs.
I also see a lot of code through the kernel using pack(1) for the exact same
reason - declare hw sensitive structures and eliminate any unexpected holes.
Regards,
Igor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists