lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:26:45 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <>
To:     Aishwarya Ramakrishnan <>,, Coccinelle <>
        "David S. Miller" <>,
        Madalin Bucur <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dpaa_eth: Fix comparing pointer to 0

> Fixes coccicheck warning:
> ./drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c:2110:30-31:
> WARNING comparing pointer to 0

Such information is actually provided by a known script for
the semantic patch language.

> Avoid pointer type value compared to 0.

But I suggest to reconsider corresponding software development consequences
also around mentioned implementation details.

> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c
> @@ -2107,7 +2107,7 @@ static int dpaa_a050385_wa(struct net_device *net_dev, struct sk_buff **s)
>  	start = PTR_ALIGN(new_skb->data, DPAA_A050385_ALIGN);
> -	if (start - new_skb->data != 0)
> +	if (start - new_skb->data)
>  		skb_reserve(new_skb, start - new_skb->data);

I interpret the source code in the way that a subtraction is performed
with two pointers. I would expect that such a pointer difference
has got an integral data type.
Will this view trigger any further software evolution?


Powered by blists - more mailing lists