lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 20:01:44 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
        Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethernet: fec: Prevent MII event after
 MII_SPEED write

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 07:58:33PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> The change to polled IO for MDIO completion assumes that MII events
> are only generated for MDIO transactions. However on some SoCs writing
> to the MII_SPEED register can also trigger an MII event. As a result,
> the next MDIO read has a pending MII event, and immediately reads the
> data registers before it contains useful data. When the read does
> complete, another MII event is posted, which results in the next read
> also going wrong, and the cycle continues.
> 
> By writing 0 to the MII_DATA register before writing to the speed
> register, this MII event for the MII_SPEED is suppressed, and polled
> IO works as expected.

Hi Andy

Could you get your LAVA instances to test this? Or do we need to wait
for it to make its way into net-next?

Thanks
	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ