[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200428222157.GA30125@salvia>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:21:57 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Linux Network Development Mailing List
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] do not typedef socklen_t on Android
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 05:26:44PM -0700, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> I don't know all that much about it. Mostly it just seems to work.
>
> I'm quoting from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bionic_(software) ;-)
>
> Bionic is basically a BSD licensed C library for use with Linux.
> This differs from other BSD C libraries which require a BSD kernel,
> and from the GNU C Library (glibc) which uses the GNU Lesser General
> Public License.
>
> For the most part it's supposed to be drop-in compatible I think,
> and the kernel headers (uapi) come from some recent version of Linux.
>
> The license and smaller size are AFAIK the main benefits.
>
> ---
>
> Got me curious and:
>
> I'm not actually sure what defines __ANDROID__, maybe __BIONIC__ would
> be a better guard?
>
> That seems to be defined in bionic/libc/include/sys/cdefs.h
>
> https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/master/libc/include/sys/cdefs.h#43
>
> And the docs here:
>
> https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/master/docs/defines.md
>
> do seem to suggest that __BIONIC__ is more equivalent to __GLIBC__
https://sourceforge.net/p/predef/wiki/Libraries/
This one also refers to the existing C library definitions which makes
more sense to me too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists