netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce new APIs to support phylink and phy layers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200430120547.GA19262@lsv03152.swis.in-blr01.nxp.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:35:47 +0530
From:   Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
        Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
        Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        Makarand Pawagi <makarand.pawagi@....com>,
        "Rajesh V . Bikkina" <rajesh.bikkina@....com>,
        Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce new APIs to support phylink
 and phy layers

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 06:54:06PM +0530, Calvin Johnson wrote:

Hi Russell, others,

> Following functions are defined:
>   phylink_fwnode_phy_connect()
>   phylink_device_phy_connect()
>   fwnode_phy_find_device()
>   device_phy_find_device()
>   fwnode_get_phy_node()
> 
> First two help in connecting phy to phylink instance.
> Next two help in finding a phy on a mdiobus.
> Last one helps in getting phy_node from a fwnode.
> 
> Changes in v2:
>   move phy code from base/property.c to net/phy/phy_device.c
>   replace acpi & of code to get phy-handle with fwnode_find_reference
>   replace of_ and acpi_ code with generic fwnode to get phy-handle.
> 
> Calvin Johnson (3):
>   device property: Introduce phy related fwnode functions
>   net: phy: alphabetically sort header includes
>   phylink: Introduce phylink_fwnode_phy_connect()
> 
>  drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/net/phy/phylink.c    | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/phy.h          |  3 ++
>  include/linux/phylink.h      |  6 +++
>  4 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

I've a new patch introducing fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy and fwnode_get_phy_id.
Can I introduce it in v3 of this patchset or do I need to send it separately?
Please advice.

Thanks
Calvin