netdev - [PATCH net-next 09/14] net/smc: move the TEST_LINK response processing into event handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200430135551.26267-10-kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:55:46 +0200
From:   Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, raspl@...ux.ibm.com,
        ubraun@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 09/14] net/smc: move the TEST_LINK response processing into event handler

Get rid of the extra function and move the two-liner for the TEST_LINK
response processing into the event handler function.

Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_llc.c | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.c b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
index f9ec270818fa..4945abbad111 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_llc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
@@ -563,13 +563,6 @@ static void smc_llc_rx_delete_link(struct smc_link *link,
 	smc_lgr_terminate_sched(lgr);
 }
 
-static void smc_llc_rx_test_link(struct smc_link *link,
-				 struct smc_llc_msg_test_link *llc)
-{
-	llc->hd.flags |= SMC_LLC_FLAG_RESP;
-	smc_llc_send_message(link, llc);
-}
-
 static void smc_llc_rx_confirm_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
 				    struct smc_llc_msg_confirm_rkey *llc)
 {
@@ -640,7 +633,8 @@ static void smc_llc_event_handler(struct smc_llc_qentry *qentry)
 
 	switch (llc->raw.hdr.common.type) {
 	case SMC_LLC_TEST_LINK:
-		smc_llc_rx_test_link(link, &llc->test_link);
+		llc->test_link.hd.flags |= SMC_LLC_FLAG_RESP;
+		smc_llc_send_message(link, llc);
 		break;
 	case SMC_LLC_ADD_LINK:
 		if (list_empty(&lgr->list))
-- 
2.17.1